wombat_socho (
wombat_socho) wrote2006-06-07 09:15 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
...
I wonder how long it'll take this to start showing up at anime conventions around here?
Via Chizumatic, appropriately enough on 6/6/06.
Via Chizumatic, appropriately enough on 6/6/06.
no subject
That, and I think there's also another fundamental difference- kigurumi like that is basically trying to look like a completely animated character, where regular cosplay is often trying to recreate that character in real life.
no subject
Maybe that's the essential point right there. With regular cosplay, sure, you're done up as an anime character, but your friends can still tell it's you in the Rose Bride/Major Armstrong/whatever getup. You don't have that with kigurumi.
no subject
no subject
There's an odd parallel here to the way anthropomorphic animals are depicted in anime as opposed to the way they're done here in the States. Catgirls, for example, are usually shown as humans with cat ears, tails, and occasionally whiskers, but Merle from Escaflowne is the only one I've ever seen that actually has fur. Now, take Tom (of Tom & Jerry) or Sylvester or (even older) Felix the Cat. These are all cats that happen to act like people, not people that look kind of like cats. I could go on and on with examples, but I'm sure you get the point.
no subject