wombat_socho

I understand that, but in his words, there are a lot of troops in Iraq that don't agree with the mission. They're outnumbered by quite a bit, to be certain, but if troops themselves are against (at least the Iraq) the mission, how do people on the homefront do more to undermine morale?
I don't think it's a matter of doing more, I think it's a matter of adding to the existing burden. All wars have had some people on the home front who didn't think it was a good idea, but Vietnam and Iraq II were the first wars since the Civil War that have seen this much virulent opposition, and it's not good for the troops.