![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Leonard Nimoy has a photo exhibit of large women. The problem with the article -which never actually shows any of the photos in question - is that you can't really tell whether these women are truly obese or New York "obese", which is to say they actually have real figures as opposed to bony meth-head carcasses or lean, sculpted greyhound physiques - the latter of which can be attractive, sometimes. Personally, I don't find 135 pounds on a 5' 3" frame obese; as with statistics, much depends on the distribution, and even before I came to Minnesota I preferred women who had enough meat on their bones not to snap while engaged in the physical act of love. (Have we reached TMI yet?) I could go on with a rant about the warped nature of the fashion industry, but I'm pretty sure I've done that before, and besides, :effort:.
(Althouse, who also likes the full figures.)
(Althouse, who also likes the full figures.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-14 07:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-14 07:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-15 03:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-15 12:37 pm (UTC)A 16 waist is TINY. At this point I'm sure I don't understand womens' sizes.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-15 02:44 am (UTC)http://www.leonardnimoyphotography.com/7body.htm
(Totally NSFW)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-15 12:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-16 04:16 pm (UTC)I do not avoid women, Mandrake... but I deny them my essence...
-rs
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-16 11:30 pm (UTC)(Icon deliberately chosen for maximum irony.)
OK
carlos
Re: OK
Date: 2007-07-31 03:04 am (UTC)