PDS spreading
Sep. 11th, 2008 07:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I think I'm going to ignore a couple of Minnesotans on my f-list who seem to have come down with full-blown PDS. Don't need the aggravation, God knows.
Work today was back to normal, e.g. ninety minutes of actual work broken up by web surfing and calling Kaiser to get prescription refills straightened out.
Review of John Barnes' The Armies of Memory to follow; right now I gotta go shoot POS.
----------------
Now playing: Pat Benatar - Invincible
Work today was back to normal, e.g. ninety minutes of actual work broken up by web surfing and calling Kaiser to get prescription refills straightened out.
Review of John Barnes' The Armies of Memory to follow; right now I gotta go shoot POS.
----------------
Now playing: Pat Benatar - Invincible
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 03:44 am (UTC)Before being nominated as Bush the Elder's VP, Quayle had developed a reputation as one of the more tech-savvy young Senators, mainly due to his interest in space and missile defense issues. Of course he came to look like an idiot, with reporters constantly following him around noting his every misstep. You'd look like a moron too if that happened. I will admit that he seemed easily rattled - something he has in common with the junior Senator from Illinois. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 03:53 am (UTC)Perhaps we are defining "smear campaign" differently. (I'm saying this in all seriousness.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:59 pm (UTC)I do have some sympathy for the poor bastard - he's quite obviously a TCK trying to fit in *somewhere* where he can be comfortable being himself, and he hasn't found it yet. Being in the harsh spotlight of national politics while being beholden to the Daley Machine ain't going to help.
The definition of "smear campaign" is one I was introduced to during my two runs for the Minnesota House, e.g. "presenting true facts about your opponent that said opponent finds hard to explain to their constituents".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 02:21 pm (UTC)Yeah, there's the issue. My definition has always included a necessary component of deliberate fact-twisting. Depending where you look for a definition, too, there are references supporting both your and my definitions of the word.
Getting back to Quayle, what I was trying to get at is that the media didn't really have to do anything other than quote the man. I bought a book back during the Bush Sr./Quayle years that I found fascinating, simply for the audacity of it. It was listed in the humor section of the bookstore, and all it was, was a collection of verbatim Quayle speeches. The "author" of the book merely put chapter headings between the quotes, and that was it.
(Pardon any grammar problems -- your "reply" boxes have gotten rather narrow, and so I'm typing blind.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 09:56 pm (UTC)